A planning committee has refused extensions to a Hampshire village house, going against its officers' advice. 

Chris Norman wanted permission to extend Jasmine Cottage in Kitnocks Hill, Curdridge, as well as adding an annexe to a garage.

Winchester City Council's planning officers recommended that permission be granted, but committee members voted to refuse it at a meeting on Wednesday July 19.

They had no issues with the house extensions, but felt the garage was too close to the edge of the boundary and would be overbearing.

Curdridge Parish Council objected with four more from the public. A total of 17 supporting comments were received, however many came from people across the country, from Ashford to Bognor Regis, the committee was told. 

READ MORE: Hampshire vineyard voted 'Best in Wessex' at WineGB Awards

Objector Steve Wallin, of Kitnocks Hill, said: “The garage extension would create a 5m high gable wall and block sunlight coming into our garden. We feel the assessment of the application is wrong and there are clear grounds for refusal. 

“There are places where the building could be positioned which would not impact us. New development should not have adverse impacts on adjoining land. It's out of character and context for this area.”

Curdridge Parish Council chairman Eric Bodger said: ”The parish council objects to the design of the annexe, not the principle of development. The high gable wall will impact neighbours and the dark finish will add to its oppressive character.”

Adam Knibb, director of Adam Knibb Architects, spoke in support. He said: “This will upgrade the existing home and garage. The annexe was designed to provide extra space for the young family. It's a high-quality, sustainable and modern design.”

SEE ALSO: Winchester shop Forme announces closure date with final sale

Cllr Frank Pearson supported the proposal. He said: “The area is characterised by large buildings surrounded by tall trees. It will create a larger building but on a very large site. There is no overdevelopment.”

However, other councillors had concerns. Cllr Vivian Achwal said: “I'm struggling with this. I think the annexe will be very overbearing. I will not be supporting it.”

Cllr Russell Gordon-Smith said: “I find it hard to cope with the very large annexe. I question why it has to be so close to the boundary. I can't support it with the garage in its present position.”

Cllr Jane Rutter, committee chairman, said: “I think the garage is in that place because that's where the existing garage is. I don't think there will be sufficient harm to turn down the application. It's a difficult balance.”

But the committee voted to refuse the plan, with three for and six against.